Ruderman v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
355 F.2d 995 · 1966
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2016
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6901 · 26 U.S.C. § 7121 · 26 U.S.C. § 7122 · 26 U.S.C. § 7454
Relies on Kreps v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · United States v. Prince · MacIntyre v. State Bank · Paddock v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may include transfers which are denoted as 'constructively fraudulent' and which fall, for example, within § 273 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.