Gonzalez v. J O'Connell’s Empirical Analysis
355 F.3d 1010 · 2004
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably Balogun v. Ashcroft (2004), Korniejew v. Ashcroft (2004)
13 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · V. C O Churner · McCarthy v. Madigan · Webster v. Doe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has been superseded by statute to the extent it held that federal prisoners seeking monetary damages in a Bivens action are not required under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e to exhaust administrative remedies provided by the Bureau of Prisons. However, McCarthy’s principle that when exhaustion is not statutorily mandated, 'sound judicial discretions governs,’ 503 U.S. at 144 , 112 S.Ct. 1081 , 117 L.Ed.2d 291 , remains good law, as does its further admonitions on how that discretion should be utilized.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“The Attorney General shall take into custody any alien who— (B) is deportable by reason of having committed any offense covered in section 1227(a) (2) (A) (ii) [crimes involving moral turpitude], (A)(iii) [“Aggravated felony”] ... when the alien is released, without regard to whether the alien is released on parole, supervised release, or probation, and without regard to whether the alien may be arrested or imprisoned again for the same offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[t]he Attorney General’s discretionary judgment regarding the application of this section shall not be subject to review. No court may set aside any action or decision by the Attorney General under this section regarding the detention or release of any alien or the grant, revocation, or denial of bond or parole.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.