Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 F.3d 1065 - Barrett v. Barnhart

Barrett v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis

355 F.3d 1065 · 2004

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
March 2023
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably Carradine v. Barnhart (2004), Prochaska v. Barnhart (2006)

24 federal appellate · 1 district ·

360200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corp. · Clifford v. Apfel · Craig v. Chater · Fargnoli v. Massanari · Zurawski v. Halter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even if Barrett's arthritis was not particularly serious in itself, it would interact with her obesity to make standing for two hours at a time more painful than it would be for a person who was either as obese as she or as arthritic as she but not both.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The test [of the plaintiff's entitlement to disability benefits] is whether she is so disabled that there are no jobs in reasonable proximity to where she lives that she is physically able to do.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “finding [that a claimant exaggerated her physical limitation is] a well-nigh unreviewable determination of credibility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.