Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 F.3d 141 - Chayoon v. Chao

Chayoon v. Chao’s Empirical Analysis

355 F.3d 141 · 2004

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2021 · most notably Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community (2014), CNA v. United States (2008)

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

160200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. · Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. · C & L Enterprises Inc. v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma · Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. City of Sherrill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`On a motion invoking sovereign immunity to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of evidence that jurisdiction exists.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.