Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 F.3d 730 - Coraggioso v. Ashcroft

Coraggioso v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

355 F.3d 730 · 2004

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 2025
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2025 · most notably Smriko v. Ashcroft (2004), Partyka v. Attorney General of the United States (2005)

12 federal appellate · 6 district ·

240200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1151 (§ 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1153 (§ 203 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1154 (§ 204 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. Juan Anibal Aguirre-Aguirre · Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Jacobson · Chen Yun Gao v. Ashcroft

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]liens who qualify, through random selection, for a visa [under the DV Program] shall remain eligible to receive such visa only through the end of the specific fiscal year for which they were selected.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is a bit misleading. Selection of an applicant's petition does not ensure that he will in fact receive a visa, as the total number of lottery winners exceeds the number of Diversity Visas available under the program. Id. at 7 (stating that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The INS's failure to process [plaintiff's] application does not extend [plaintiff's] statutorily-limited period of eligibility for a diversity visa.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.