Kalman v. Walsh’s Empirical Analysis
1934
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2009
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hewitt v. Board of Medical Examiners · Klafter v. State Board of Examiners · Schireson v. Walsh · People v. Love · 57 Cal. App. 260 - Dyment v. Board of Medical Examiners
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The charges against the complainant herein, in order to confer jurisdiction upon the dental committee, should have been in writing, filed with the secretary of the board and contain direct, positive and specific charges based upon the alleged commission by the accused of some of the acts prohibited by section 7. [Citations.] Under the notice purporting to contain the charges against tire complainant and served upon him by the Department, the dental committee has no jurisdiction to conduct the alleged investigation against him or to enter any order revoking or suspending his license.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The supposed `written charges' as contained in such writing appear to be rather a galaxy of `whethers' or `whether or nots,' rather than written charges of the violation of any of the acts legislated against by said section 7, as it existed prior to July 7, 1933.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tarr v. Hallihan“refinements, niceties, and subtleties of pleadings in courts of record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tarr v. Hallihan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.