355 Ill. Dec. 425 - People v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · 85 Ill. 2d 253 - Sears v. Sears · 357 Ill. App. 3d 806 - People v. Serio · 286 Ill. App. 3d 353 - People v. Neal · 323 Ill. App. 3d 199 - People v. Miraglia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether [the defendant's] pro se motion for reduction of sentence adequately raised an issue of ineffective assistance of counsel, in which case it would be an exception to the general rule that defendants are not entitled to file pro se motions while represented by counsel and, under Rule 606, would make the notice of appeal ineffective .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Bell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.