355 Ill. Dec. 943 - People v. Patrick’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Morrison · 102 Ill. 2d 181 - People v. Krankel · 207 Ill. 2d 68 - People v. Moore · 76 Ill. 2d 427 - Burtell v. First Charter Service Corp. · 234 Ill. 2d 32 - People v. Lewis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he State's attempt to graft the statutory requirement in section 116-1(b) onto a common law remedy is fundamentally flawed. A pro se posttrial motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel is not a new trial motion as outlined in section 116-1. Rather, it is part of a separate common law procedure developed in a line of cases beginning with Krankel .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Bell · People v. Darr“The common-law procedure, which has evolved from our decision in Krankel , is triggered when a defendant raises a pro se posttrial claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Bates · People v. Roddis“once a notice of appeal has been filed, the trial court loses jurisdiction”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.