Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 Md. 287 - Bailey v. State

Bailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
6
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably Deville v. State (2004), 140 N.C. App. 198 - State v. Jarman (2000)

40 state decisions

1901999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3563

Relies on Walczak v. State · Maus v. State · People v. Ledford · State v. Brown · Matthews v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Solution of this issue by the Legislature is most appropriate and is supported by sound practical reasons. The Legislature is better suited to crafting the limitations of the program and the permissible duration of the home confinement viz a viz the maximum period of incarceration. We recognize that home detention might be beneficial in many cases; nonetheless, we believe that “this policy and the limits which should be placed upon it are matters properly for the legislature to consider and not for this court to attempt to read into the present statute(s).” Stone [ v. State], 43 Md.App. [329,] at 336, 405 A.2d [345,] at 348-49 [(1979)] (quoting People v. Ledford, 173 Colo. 194 , 477 P.2d 374 (1970)).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[wjhile at home, an offender enjoys unrestricted freedom of activity, movement, and association. He can eat, sleep, make phone calls, watch television, and entertain guests at his leisure. Furthermore, an offender confined to his home does not suffer the same surveillance and lack of privacy that he would if he were actually incarcerated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.