Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 Md. 651 - Moosavi v. State

Moosavi v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
3
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

70 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Fisher and Utley v. State (2001), Bible v. State (2009)

70 state decisions

3801999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Evans · DiPino v. Davis · Walczak v. State · Harden v. Mass Transit Administration · Ritchie v. Donnelly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]rdinarily ... will not decide any ... issue unless it plainly appears by the record to have been raised in or decided by the trial court....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]f [the criminal offense charged] is clearly inapplicable to [a defendant’s] conduct, and if the only reason for not reversing his conviction is the failure of appellate counsel to raise the issue in the Court of Special Appeals, under the circumstances of this case [a defendant] would be entitled to relief in an appropriate post conviction proceeding collaterally attacking his conviction. In light of this, fairness and interests of judicial economy justify granting relief on direct appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A person is guilty of a misdemeanor if, knowing the statement to be false, he circulates or transmits to another or others, with intent that it be acted upon, a statement or rumor, written, printed, or by word of mouth, concerning the location or possible detonation of a bomb or other explosive.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.