Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 Md. 89 - State v. Brown

State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2020

18 state decisions

1001999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Jorn · United States v. Dinitz · State v. Hicks · State v. Frazier · Arthur Treacher's Fish & Chips of Fairfax, Inc. v. Chillum Terrace Ltd. Partnership

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he critical postponement for purposes of Rule 4-271 is the one that carries the case beyond the 180 day deadline [the Hicks date]. It is that postponement to which a reviewing court looks, and, when deciding whether to dismiss a case for inordinate delay, it is the length of the delay between the postponed trial date and the rescheduled date that is significant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"A second circumstance where it is inappropriate to dismiss the criminal charges is where the defendant, either individually or by his attorney , seeks or expressly consents to a trial date in violation of Rule 746."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The critical order by the administrative judge, for purposes of the dismissal sanction, is the order having the effect of extending the trial date beyond 180 days.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.