Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 Mo. 173 - State v. Oliver

State v. Oliver’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
7
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently August 2009 · most notably State v. Cobb (1969), State v. Watson (1961)

57 state decisions

2701946195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Denison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘To create an inference of guilt, the term "exclusive” does not mean that the possession must be separate from all others provided there is other evidence to connect the defendant with the offense. * !]: »>»”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The defendant’s main point is that his possession was not exclusive. It is true that other members of the household had access to the stolen property, but it was also clearly proved that a part of the stolen property was on defendant’s premises with his conscious knowledge; that he had worked on the radio; * * * “To create an inference of guilt, the term ‘exclusive’ does not mean that the possession must be separate from all others provided there is other evidence to connect defendant with the offense. 12 C.J.S. Burglary, § 59 subsec. b, p. 738;* * *.” Id., 195 S.W.2d at page 485 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.