Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 Mo. 577 - State v. Foster

State v. Foster’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

99
cited by 99 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

99 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 99 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably State v. Brookshire (1962), State v. Hale (1963)

99 state decisions

31019461950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Gadwood · State v. Frazier · State v. Brinkley · State v. Graves · State v. Neal

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * (4) Whether requested or not, the court must instruct the jury in writing upon all questions of law arising in the case which are necessary for their information in giving their verdict; which instructions shall include, whenever necessary, the subjects of good character and reasonable doubt; and a failure to so instruct in cases of felony shall be good cause, when the defendant is found guilty, for setting aside the verdict of the jury and granting a new trial; * * See also S.Ct. Rule 26.02(6), V.A.M.R.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In the application of the maxim (falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus) the rule established in this state is that if the jury believe a witness has committed perjury in the case on trial by wilfully swearing falsely to a material fact, they may for that reason alone reject the rest of his testimony, but cannot be required to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “must set forth in detail and with particularity, in separate numbered paragraphs, the specific grounds or causes therefor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.