Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 Mo. 59 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
May 2004
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently May 2004 · most notably State v. Lang (1974), State v. Stapleton (1975)

2 federal appellate · 46 state decisions

1701946195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Hogan · State v. Raines · State v. Mathews · State v. Howe · Fulkerson v. Murdock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence to show that an accused has attempted to fabricate or procure false evidence or destroy evidence against him is always admissible as showing consciousness of guilt. State v. Mathews, 202 Mo. 143 , 100 S.W. 420 . `Evidence of the fact of an attempted subornation is admissible as an admission by conduct that the party's cause is an unrighteous one.' Fulkerson v. Murdock, 53 Mo.App. 151 , loc. cit. 154. See also State v. Howe, 287 Mo. 1 , 228 S.W. 477 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.