Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 NW2D 207 - Grunke v. Kloskin

Grunke v. Kloskin’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1990
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co. · Kosloski v. Jones · Sommers v. Thomas · Vrooman Floor Covering Inc. v. Dorsey · Hengel v. Hyatt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he party in default [must show] that he (a) is possessed of a reasonable defense on the merits, (b) has a reasonable excuse for his failure or neglect to answer, (c) has acted with due diligence after notice of the entry of judgment, and (d) that no substantial prejudice will result to the other party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The existence of a meritorious defense may be established in an affidavit or by other proof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.