State v. Maniccia’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2014
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Carlton E. Bryant, United States of America v. William E. Turner · State v. Horn · State v. Barker · State v. Langlet
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If you find from the evidence that there existed a tape recording . . . and that the state intentionally destroyed the tape recording, you may, but are not required to, infer that the information contained on the tape recording would be, if available, adverse to the state and favorable to the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Where evidence is material and there is the `unavoidable possibility that the [evidence] might have significantly favored the accused,' denial of access to the evidence is a denial of due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Evidence is material if it is offered to prove a proposition which is a matter in issue or is probative of the matter in issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.