Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 NW2D 32 - State v. Groscost

State v. Groscost’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2009

8 state decisions

60198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3500

Relies on United States v. Agurs · Jencks v. United States · Palermo v. United States · Ryan v. United States · Kentucky v. Indiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order for statements to be subject to the Jencks Act procedures, which we have approved, it is necessary that they be written statements made by the witness and signed, or otherwise adopted or approved by the witness, or that they be a stenographic, mechanical, electrical, or other recording, or a transcription thereof, which is a substantially verbatim recital of an oral statement made by said witness and recorded contemporaneously without the making of such oral statement. The distinction between a statement made by a witness and one that is an imprecise summary of what another understood the witness to say has been made on the federal level as well as in Iowa.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “demands that the state's files be rummaged for unidentified alleged exculpatory evidence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.