Saepharn v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Texas v. Brown · Minnesota v. Dickerson · 18 Ill. App. 3d 587 - People v. Symmonds · Booth v. State · Klenke v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"In [ Minnesota v. ] Dickerson , [ 508 U.S. 366 , 113 S.Ct. 2130 , 124 L.Ed.2d 334 (1993) ], the Supreme Court re-affirmed the principle that when the police conduct a pat-down search during an investigative stop, the purpose of the pat-down is to ensure officer safety, and the scope of this search must be limited to '[what] is necessary for the discovery of weapons'. Id. , 508 U.S. at 373 , 113 S.Ct. at 2136 . It is unlawful for the police to expand the scope of the pat-down beyond this limit in an effort to discover evidence of a crime. Ibid. "”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McGuire v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.