Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 Pa. Super. 10 - Commonwealth v. Hook

355 Pa. Super. 10 - Commonwealth v. Hook’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 2016

17 state decisions

601986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pennsylvania v. Goldhammer · Commonwealth v. Rhodes · 324 Pa. Super. 420 - Commonwealth v. Taylor · Commonwealth v. Goldhammer · 264 Pa. Super. 118 - Commonwealth v. Hughes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Offense defined. — Except as provided in subsection (a.l), a person is guilty of kidnapping if he unlawfully removes another a substantial distance under the circumstances from the place where he is found, or if he unlawfully confines another for a substantial period in a place of isolation, with any of the following intentions: (1) To hold for ransom or reward,, or as a shield or hostage. (2) To facilitate commission of .any felony or flight thereafter. (3) To inflict bodily injury on or to terrorize the victim or another. (4) To interfere with the performance by public officials of any governmental or political function.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.