Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

355 Pa. Super. 108

Commonwealth v. Dollman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 1986

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1986-07-16

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 1994

8 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-07-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

ROWLEY, Judge,

¶1dissenting:

¶2I respectfully dissent. In my judgment the granting of a new trial under these circumstances invades the sound discretion vested in the trial judge and exceeds the narrow standard of appellate review assigned to us. The evidence complained of was relevant. My review of the record does not indicate that the appellant was unfairly prejudiced or that the jury was confused or misled by its introduction. In fact, the record suggests the contrary. The Commonwealth sought a conviction for first degree murder. The jury, instead, convicted appellant of only voluntary manslaughter. Therefore, I would affirm the judgment of sentence.

/355/pasuper/108 · .json · Public domain