Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 Pa. Super. 409 - Wikoski v. Wikoski

355 Pa. Super. 409 - Wikoski v. Wikoski’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2000
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Michigan v. Long · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. Y Button · Sherbert v. Verner · Everson v. Board of Education · Thomas v. Collins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences; No (sic) man can of right be compelled to attend, erect or support any place of worship, or to maintain any ministry against his consent; No (sic) human authority can, in any case, whatever, control or interfere with the rights of conscience, and no preference shall ever be given by law to any religious establishments or modes of worship. The provision at issue is that providing for freedom of “the rights of conscience.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.