Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 S.C. 175 - State v. Chisolm

State v. Chisolm’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bailey · State v. Burdette · State v. McHoney · State v. Cribb · Brown v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no dispute that the State did not submit the testimony of each individual who handled the evidence nor did the State comply with Rule 6(b). The trial cowi, however, allowed the introduction of the evidence despite the missing links in the chain because the State demonstrated that the evidence had not been tampered with by the time [the chemist] received it for analysis. This was error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.