Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 S.C. 255 - State v. Thompson

State v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Gideon v. Wainwright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Except in cases wherein capital punishment is a permissible sentence, a person indicted for misdemeanors and/or felonies may voluntarily waive his right to be present and may be tried in his absence upon a finding by the court that such person has received notice of his right to be present and that a warning was given that the trial would proceed in his absence upon a failure to attend the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Faretta 2 requires that a defendant be made aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation so that the record will establish he knows what he is doing and his choice is made with eyes open.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A defendant can forfeit his right to counsel irrespective of his knowledge of ... the dangers of self-representation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.