State v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Gideon v. Wainwright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Except in cases wherein capital punishment is a permissible sentence, a person indicted for misdemeanors and/or felonies may voluntarily waive his right to be present and may be tried in his absence upon a finding by the court that such person has received notice of his right to be present and that a warning was given that the trial would proceed in his absence upon a failure to attend the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Faretta 2 requires that a defendant be made aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation so that the record will establish he knows what he is doing and his choice is made with eyes open.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Jackson“A defendant can forfeit his right to counsel irrespective of his knowledge of ... the dangers of self-representation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Osbey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.