Miles v. Miles’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cherry v. Thomasson · Stevenson v. Stevenson · E.D.M. v. T.A.M. · Rutherford v. Rutherford · Edm v. Tam
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whenever any husband or wife, pursuant to a judgment of divorce from the bonds of matrimony, has been required to make his or her spouse any periodic payments of alimony and the circumstances of the parties or the financial ability of the spouse making the periodic payments shall have changed since the rendition of such judgment, either party may apply to the court which rendered the judgment for an order and judgment decreasing or increasing the amount of such alimony payments or terminating such payments and the court, after giving both parties an opportunity to be heard and to introduce evidence relevant to the issue, shall make such order and judgment as justice and equity shall require, with due regard to the changed circumstances and the financial ability of the supporting spouse, decreasing or increasing or confirming the amount of alimony provided for in such original judgment or terminating such payments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holmes v. Holmes“Many of the same considerations relevant to the initial setting of an alimony award may be applied in the modification context as well, including . . . each party's earning capacity[ ] and the supporting spouse's ability to continue to support the other spouse.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miles v. Miles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.