Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cherry v. State · Holland v. State · State v. Graham · Ford v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Mutual intent is 'manifested by the acts and conduct of the parties and the circumstances attending and leading up to the combat.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Washington“Mutual combat bars a claim of self-defense because it negates the element of 'not being at fault.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Washington“Mutual combat exists when there is 'mutual intent and willingness to fight.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Washington
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.