Johnson v. Arbabi’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of Greenville · Ingram v. Kasey's Associates · Am. Fed. Bank v. NO. 1 MAIN JT. VENTURE · American Federal Bank v. Number One Main Joint Venture · Dibble v. Bryant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Dr. Arbabi left the marital home in April 1991. Yet, on April 22, 1991, his attorney wrote the County a letter requesting the Assessor's office to send all future tax bills directly to Dr. Arbabi at the [marital home]. Moreover, Dr. Arbabi stated he never returned to the marital home and Mrs. Arbabi delivered the mail either to him or his attorney. This arrangement apparently went on from April 1991 through, at least, November 1992-over a year and a half. Certainly, Dr. Arbabi knew he was going to receive mail related to the [property at issue] during that time period. Yet, there is no evidence in the record that Dr. Arbabi at any time filed a change of address form with the post office or wrote the County with another, more appropriate, address for him. Under this evidence, we find that Dr. Arbabi, by his actions, appointed Mrs. Arbabi his agent for receiving any and all mail that was directed to the [marital home].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Hull v. D'Arcy“In an action at equity, tried by a judge alone, an appellate court may find facts in accordance with its own view of the preponderance of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An action to remove a cloud on and quiet title to land is one in equity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.