Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

355 S.C. 85

In re Reichmanis

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 25, 2003

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 2003-07-25

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 2004

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-07-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2Pursuant to the Rule 28(b)(6)(A), of the Rules of Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (“RLDE”), we VACATE the interim suspension placed on Maria Reichmanis and place her on incapacity inactive status based on the severity of her documented medical condition.

¶3Further, pursuant to Rule 28(b)(6)(C), RLDE, we defer all pending disciplinary matters against Ms. Reichmanis because she has established that she is unable to assist in her own defense. This stay of the proceedings will be in effect until Ms. Reichmanis attempts to change her incapacity inactive status.

¶4IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/JEAN H. TOAL, C.J./s/JAMES E. MOORE, J./s/JOHN H. WALLER, JR., J./s/E.C. BURNETT, III, J.PLEICONES, J., not participating.
/355/sc/85 · .json · Public domain