Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 SO2D 1082 - Andersen v. Eagle Asbestos Co.

Andersen v. Eagle Asbestos Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 2011

14 state decisions

6019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Manuel v. Jennings Lumber Company · 324 So. 2d 895 - Deshotels v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York · Cain v. Board of Supervisors of Elections · 248 So. 2d 908 - Manuel v. Jennings Lumber Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The judgment for past expenses obviously refers to those expenses not paid by defendants, and the award for "future medical payments as they become necessary" merely confirms plaintiff's right to claim the expenses as they become due. Because defendants are responsible for the payment of medical expenses incurred in connection with the work-connected injury, we perceive no prejudice to defendants by the wording of the trial court's judgment relating to their payment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A workmen's compensation claimant is not entitled to an award for future medical expenses, but the right to claim such expenses is reserved to her.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “future medical payments as they become necessary”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.