Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 SO2D 1106 - Bell v. State

Bell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2006

10 state decisions

501978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 310 So. 2d 908 - Lay v. State · Ladnier v. State · 285 So. 2d 783 - Burnett v. State · Watson v. State · 269 So. 2d 645 - McGowan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]nder our practice, if enhanced punishment is sought, the indictment or affidavit must include both the principal charge and a charge of previous convictions and both charges proved before punishment may be enhanced.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.