Stipp v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““We now hold that yards, courtyards, driveways and parking areas usually and customarily used in common by occupants of apartment houses, condominiums and other such complexes with other occupants thereof constitute a part of the curtilage of a specifically described apartment or condominium or other living unit thereof and that an automobile located on such common areas and identified by the use of keys obtained from the occupant of such specifically described apartment, condominium or other living unit is a part of that curtilage and subject to search upon the issuance of a valid warrant authorizing a search of the living unit and curtilage thereof.””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Rogers v. State · 491 So. 2d 1307 - Simmons v. State

2. “We think the search of these vehicles was authorized under the warrant since they were in the curtilage described and under the control of the suspects in the house. 355 So.2d at 1218 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 402 So. 2d 1216 - State v. Haugee