355 So. 2d 138 - Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
April 1981
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 245 So. 2d 225 - State v. Ashby · 327 So. 2d 243 - Stanley v. State · Tiller v. State · Lamar v. Estate of Lamar · Perry v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"... With regard to a motion to suppress, the record at the time of the tender of the plea of nolo contendere must clearly show that the state's case against the accused cannot succeed without use of the evidence sought to be suppressed. Gibbs v. State, 344 So.2d 621 (Fla.3rd DCA 1977); Tiller v. State, 330 So.2d 792, 793 (Fla.1st DCA (1976)." ( Brown v. State , opinion page 140)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Webb v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.