355 So. 2d 1381 - Odom v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
78 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 667 So. 2d 1242 - Ballenger v. State (1995), 645 So. 2d 829 - Chase v. State (1994)
78 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. State · Hilbun v. State · 231 So. 2d 798 - Ratliff v. Nail
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) relevant to the voir dire examination; (2) whether it was unambiguous; and (3) whether the juror had substantial knowledge of the information sought to be elicited.”
40 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Doss v. State · Langston v. State“... No firm, unbending rule can be laid down that would control every situation that might arise on the voir dire of perspective jurors. Therefore, each case must be decided on an ad hoc basis considering the facts then before the court.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. State · Sewell v. State“Such examination in this case would have, in all probability, established that the juror's brother was in fact a policeman in the area where the crime for which the appellant was being tried occurred, thus giving him a rational basis from which to challenge the jury peremptorily, if not for cause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.