State v. Segers’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably 851 So. 2d 921 - State v. Tate (2003), 425 So. 2d 1222 - State v. Trahan (1983)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Ventresca · Oregon v. Mathiason · United States v. Harris · Beckwith v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“arrested or detained in connection with the investigation”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Menne · State v. Sumler“indicating the degree the police suspect the person interrogated of committing the offense ...”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"The absence of a date for each episode described in the affidavit is not fatal, however. The language of the affidavit, including the use of the present tense, indicates that the affiants are describing a course of conduct continuing to the date of the warrant. . . . Such an affidavit has been held to be adequate if, in a commonsense construction, it can be said from the face of the affidavit that the information received by the affiant was current and not stale. See: Borras v. State, 229 So.2d 244 (Fla., 1969); State v. Clay, 7 Wash.App. 631 , 501 P.2d 603 (1973); Sutton v. State, 419 S.W.2d 857 (Tex.Cr.App., 1967); Lewis v. State, 126 Ga.App. 123 , 190 S.E.2d 123 (1972). . . ." State v. Boudreaux, 304 So.2d 343, 345-46 (La.1974).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Loehr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.