Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 So. 2d 407 - McQueen v. State

355 So. 2d 407 - McQueen v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently October 2009 · most notably 505 So. 2d 1067 - Donahoo v. State (1986), Watson v. State (1980)

31 state decisions

2101978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nichols v. State · Arant v. State · 41 Ala. App. 46 - Lackey v. State · Brown v. State · 36 Ala. App. 59 - Carroll v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . . collate, sift, and treat [the] evidence in his own way.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"A motion to exclude . . . will not preserve error in the admission of evidence where no timely objection has been made at the time of its admission. McQueen v. State , Ala.Cr.App., 355 So.2d 407 (1978); Body v. State , Ala.Cr.App., 341 So.2d 744 , cert. den., Ala., 341 So.2d 748 (1976)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “". . . Statements of counsel in argument to the jury must be viewed as in the heat of debate, and such statements are usually valued by the jury at their true worth and are not expected to become factors in the formation of the verdict. . . ." (Citations omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.