Curry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1989
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. United States · 291 So. 2d 241 - Duncan v. State · 151 So. 2d 283 - State v. Leveson · Mann v. State · 326 So. 2d 448 - Roche v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Jones , the U.S. Supreme Court held that when the prosecution allege[d] possession as the gravamen of the offense charged, it is estopped from denying possession as a predicate for standing to attack the seizure of the evidence allegedly possessed. To put it another way, if the prosecution is relying upon the seizure to prove a charge of possession, the person charged automatically has standing to contest the legality of the search regardless of whether he had a possessory interest in the premises searched. Thus, Jones was a departure from earlier cases which had held that one must have a possessory interest in the premises being searched in order to have standing to attack the search. 355 So.2d at 463 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Daley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.