Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 SO2D 94 - Stewart v. State

Stewart v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 2016

19 state decisions

7019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Johnson · United States v. Shuford · United States v. Roberts · Bush v. United States · United States v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The law presumes every person charged with the commission of a crime to be innocent. This presumption places upon the State the burden of proving the Defendant guilty of every material element of the crime with which he is charged. Before you can return a verdict of guilty, the State must prove to your satisfaction beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant throughout the trial and prevails at its close unless overcome by evidence which satisfies the Jury of his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. [sic] The Defendant is not required to prove his innocence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We are aware that allowing Brown to be questioned in the presence of the jury may open the door for defense counsel to attempt to impeach Brown by asking questions he knows Brown will refuse to answer and by inference get inadmissible evidence before the jury. However, we are of the opinion that the potential for a miscarriage of justice is minimal, particularly in view of the fact that the jury can be instructed not to draw any inferences from the witness' assertion of his Fifth Amendment privilege.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The judge in any criminal cause, shall not sum up or comment on the testimony, or charge the jury as to the weight of evidence... .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.