Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 S.W.2d 621 - Roy v. Tinsley

Roy v. Tinsley’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1976
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Leidy v. Taliaferro · Foster v. Campbell · Pashalian v. Big-4 Chevrolet Company · Martin v. Mercantile Trust Company · 241 Mo. App. 879 - Spears v. SGHANTZ

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An agency may be defined as a contract either express or implied upon a consideration, or a gratuitous undertaking, by which one of the parties confides to the other the management of some business to be transacted in his name or on his account, and by which that other assumes to do the business and render an account of it. This is comparable with the definition of agency as adopted by the American Law Institute. That definition is as follows: ‘Agency is the relationship which results from the manifestation of consent by one person to another that the other shall act on his behalf and subject to his control, and consent by the other so to act.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Under the law there is no presumption of agency and the burden of establishing it is on the party by whom it is alleged to exist.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.