Bryant v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2012
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 238th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Bearden v. Georgia · Ford v. State · Rickels v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“compensation paid to appointed counsel, community supervision fees, court costs, restitution, or reparations.” See former Tex.Code Crim. Proc. 42.12 § 8(c), am. Acts 1977, 65th R.S., ch. 342 (S.B. 32), §§ 1, 2, effective August 29, 1977. Under that version, evidence demonstrating inability to pay restitution precluded revocation on that basis. Id. In 2007, however, in addition to shifting to the State the burden of demonstrating a defendant’s ability to pay certain court costs and fees, the Legislature deleted the term”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bryant v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.