Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

355 U.S. 21

Hobart v. Hobart

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1957-10-21

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1957-10-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2003 · most notably Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., Appellees (1974), New York v. Hendrickson Bros. (1988)

34 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions

210195719601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Messrs. Baird Broomhall, William M. Harrelson and Richard Wilson, for appellant.

C. V. Diedel and Mr. Frank E. Bazler, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

/355/us/21 · .json · Public domain