Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 U.S. 579 - Harmon v. Brucker

Harmon v. Brucker’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

796
cited by 796 later decisions
46
cited 46 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

324 federal appellate · 123 district · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 796 later decisions (46 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner (1967), Trop v. Dulles (1958)

324 federal appellate · 123 district · 27 state decisions

248019581960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedHarmon v. Brucker (from District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 10 U.S.C. § 3811 · 5 U.S.C. § 1001

Relies on Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath · Orloff v. Willoughby · Philadelphia Co. v. Stimson · Stark v. Wickard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 796 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “judicial relief from this illegality would be available”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “duty [of courts] to avoid deciding constitutional questions presented unless essential to proper disposition of a case.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the type of discharge to be issued is to be determined solely by the soldier's military record in the Army,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.