Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

355 U.S. 601

Spevack v. Strauss

Supreme Court of the United States · decided March 3, 1958

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided March 3, 1958

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1993 · most notably Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios Inc (1984), U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co. (1988)

32 federal appellate · 1 district ·

18019581960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Messrs. Carleton U. Edwards, II, Joseph Y. Houghton and Bernard Margolius, for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Messrs. E. Riley Casey and Roland A. Anderson, for respondents.

Messrs. Elisha Hanson, Arthur B. Hanson and Calvin H. Cobb, Jr., for American Chemical Society, as amicus curiae.

Mr. Carlton S. Dargusch, for Engineers Joint Council, as amicus curiae.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals, and the orders of the Court of Appeals denying petitioner's motion for leave to amend the complaint and petition for rehearing, are vacated. The case is remanded to the Court ofAppeals with instruction (1) to allow petitioner's proposed amendments to the complaint and (2) to determine, in light of the amended complaint, the issues raised by petitioner's appeal.

/355/us/601 · .json · Public domain