355 Wis. 2d 503 - State v. Krancki’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2020
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 92 Wis. 2d 797 - State v. MacHner · 153 Wis. 2d 121 - State v. Johnson · 143 Wis. 2d 226 - State v. Sorenson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“counsel was ethically bound to Krancki's decision to testify as that was Krancki's constitutional right, and counsel's . . . statement. . . was a direct result of a decision dictated by Krancki.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'[i]f a defendant selects a course of action, that defendant will not be heard later to allege error or defects precipitated by such action.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.