Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

356 Ark. 423

Peters v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 11, 2004

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 2004-03-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2005

1 state decisions

Relies on Rogers v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-03-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Appellant Daniel Nobice Peters, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, Phillip A. McGough, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

¶2 We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

¶3The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

/356/ark/423 · .json · Public domain