Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 356 F.2d 171 - Smith v. Lauritzen

Smith v. Lauritzen’s Empirical Analysis

356 F.2d 171 · 1966

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2009

9 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

7019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boudoin v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co. · Brown v. United States · McNello v. John B. Kelly, Inc. · Jones v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co. · Josey v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Thus, although it can be said that mere words may be sufficient provocation to signal the start of a longshoremens brawl or fisticuffs, it is not enough when the means of attack is an unmistakebly dangerous or deadly weapon.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.