Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 356 F.2d 297 - Phillips v. United States

Phillips v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

356 F.2d 297 · 1965

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

67 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably United States v. Ironworkers Local 86 (1971), United States v. Kaplan (1977)

67 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

400196519701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 28 U.S.C. § 1732

Relies on Pinkerton v. United States · Ingram v. United States · Carbo v. United States · Standard Oil Company of California v. Moore · 58 Cal. 2d 732 - People v. Marsh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But no question appears to have been raised concerning the possibility that not all of the conspirators had seen the complaints. The appellants in that case argued only that the testimony concerning these complaints was hearsay and that some of the complaints concerning which testimony had been received had not been brought to the attention of any of the conspirators. We do not regard Press as authority contrary to our views as expressed above.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(t)he documents in question were received . . . for the jury's consideration in determining whether one or more of the defendants knew”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.