Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 356 F.2d 442 - Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated v. Methode Electronics, Inc., Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated v. General Telephone & Electronics Corporation and Automatic Electric Company, Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd., and Technogrpah Printed Electronics, Incorporated v. Webcor, Incorporated, Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated v. Croname, Incorporated

Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated v. Methode Electronics, Inc., Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated v. General Telephone & Electronics Corporation and Automatic Electric Company, Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd., and Technogrpah Printed Electronics, Incorporated v. Webcor, Incorporated, Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated v. Croname, Incorporated’s Empirical Analysis

356 F.2d 442 · 1966

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
October 2005
most recently cited

28 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently October 2005 · most notably Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. United States (1967), Giordano v. Lee (1970)

28 federal appellate ·

29019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Douglas v. Alabama · Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. Winters · Mast Foos Company v. Stover Manufacturing Company · Triplett v. Lowell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is true that the district court here had the Bendix opinion to consider, but that is a far cry from having before it the record of the testimony in that case or finding that plaintiffs have no new or additional evidence.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““After careful consideration of the record, the arguments and the briefs of counsel, we are persuaded that the patent claims are invalid for obviousness in the light of the prior art for the reasons fully discussed in the opinion of the District Court. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “They may `speak for themselves' but we feel the need of expert translation and interpretation, screened for us by appearance and demonstration before a trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.