Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 356 F.2d 449 - Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. FMC Corp.

Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. FMC Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

356 F.2d 449 · 1966

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
May 2001
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 2001 · most notably Grafon Corp. v. Hausermann (1979), International Harvester Co. v. Deere & Co. (1980)

17 federal appellate · 4 district ·

14019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aralac, Inc. v. Hat Corp. · Electro Bleachung Gas Co. v. Paradon Engineering Co. · National Coupling Co. v. Press-Seal Gasket Corp. · Ashbaugh v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Declaratory Judgment Act created no new rights, but rather created a new remedy with which to adjudicate existing rights.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.