Stella McSPARRAN, Administratrix of the Estate of Ignatius Peter Kane, Deceasedv.Edward Thomas SUBERS
Stella McSPARRAN, Administratrix of the Estate of Ignatius Peter Kane, Deceasedv.John HANIGAN, Individually and Trading as the Hanigan Construction Company, Walter Hinkle, Individually and Trading as the Hinkle Excavation Company and Robert R. Tyler, Individually and Trading as the Robert R. Tyler and Co. and John McShain, Inc
(Third-Party Plaintiff)v.WILLIAM H. WALTERS & SONS, INC. (Third-Party Defendant). Stella McSparran, Administratrix of the Estate of Ignatius pater Kane, Deceased, Appellant in No. 15477. John Hanigan, Individually and Trading as the Hanigan Construction Company, Appellant in No. 15478. Walter Hinkle, Individually and Trading as the Hinkle Excavation Company, Appellant in No. 15479. Robert R. Tyler, Individually and Trading as the Robert R. Tyler Company, Appellant in No. 15480
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1966-02-18
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 1988
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Norman Paul Harvey, Liebert, Harvey, Herting & Short, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant Hanigan, ect.
Joseph G. Manta, Esq., LaBrum & Doak, Philadelphia, Pa. (James M. Marsh, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant Hinkle, etc.
Harry Nixon, Philadelphia, Pa. (Michael A. Foley, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant Tyler, etc.
Kenneth Syken, Richter, Lord, Toll & Cavanaugh, Philadelphia, Pa. (B. Nathaniel Richter, Jack J. Bernstein, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant McSparran. Counsel for appellee Hanigan and others.
Before McLAUGHLIN, FORMAN and GANEY, Circuit Judges.
We find that as to the merits, with particular reference to the primary questions of liability of appellants, the first trial of these suits was without substantial error and that the issues were properly submitted to the jury.
