Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

356 F.2d 984

Docket No. 15485.

Broomer v. Schultz

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Feb. 23, 1966. Decided March 16, 1966.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1966-03-16

2 counsel of record

Relies on 239 F. Supp. 699 - Broomer v. Schultz · Cenac Towing Company, Inc. v. Ernest J. Stoufflet, Jr. · Stoufflet v. Cenac Towing Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1966-03-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2000

5 district ·

6019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Joseph S. Lord, III, Judge.

James F. McCort, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.

Edward Davis, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees.

Before HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

While this action of dissident members of a labor union against officers and business agents of the union was heard on a motion for a preliminary injunction, all parties agreed to a final disposition of the cause without further hearing. The court, after setting out in an opinion, D.C., 239 F.Supp. 699, its analysis of the plaintiffs' claims and such evidence as was introduced, denied relief.

¶2

We have examined the record and find no error in the reasoning or the decision of the trial court.

¶3

The judgment will be affirmed.

/356/f2d/984 · .json · Public domain