Cazarez-Gutierrez v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
356 F.3d 1015 · 2004
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 844 (§ 404 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Brecht v. Abrahamson · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · United States v. Lopez · Lorillard v. Pons
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.